The poem at 3 a.m.

[George Dance]

The poem at 3 a.m.
Does not want to be written;
It visits only to mock you.

-GJD

[b***@gmail.com]

Post by George Dance
The poem at 3 a.m.
Does not want to be written;
It visits only to mock you.
-GJD

It's true, poems have no sense of decency, knocking on the door at ungodly hours.

[Will Dockery]

Post by George Dance
The poem at 3 a.m.
Does not want to be written;
It visits only to mock you.
-GJD

And here I am, just arriving at 3:07 a.m.

Weary...

:D

[Michael Pendragon]

Post by George Dance
The poem at 3 a.m.
Does not want to be written;
It visits only to mock you.
-GJD

I love this one.

I've had more than my share of those along with another variety that's equally taxing: the ones that come at 3 a.m. and insist on being heard even though I've got to get up at 6:15 for work.

[Will Dockery]

Post by Michael Pendragon

Post by George Dance
The poem at 3 a.m.
Does not want to be written;
It visits only to mock you.
-GJD

I love this one.
I've had more than my share of those along with another variety that's equally taxing: the ones that come at 3 a.m. and insist on being heard even though I've got to get up at 6:15 for work.

Probably why I've opted for the graveyard shift in almost every walk of life... I just love 3 a.m. for almost any activity.

:D

[Michael Pendragon]

Post by Will Dockery

Post by Michael Pendragon

Post by George Dance
The poem at 3 a.m.
Does not want to be written;
It visits only to mock you.
-GJD

I love this one.
I've had more than my share of those along with another variety that's equally taxing: the ones that come at 3 a.m. and insist on being heard even though I've got to get up at 6:15 for work.

Probably why I've opted for the graveyard shift in almost every walk of life... I just love 3 a.m. for almost any activity.

A love we share. On non-work days I revert back to my natural sleep pattern of sunrise to noon.

[Will-Dockery]

Post by George Dance
The poem at 3 a.m
Does not want to be written;
It visits only to mock you
-GJ

Short, but a favorite


This is a response to the post seen at
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658995311#65899531

[Will-Dockery]

it would make more sense to me if it were 3:30 am, but who am i t

know anything? (seriously

man, i wish i could have kept going in school. :-((
it was getting so hard, but anything inferior, is just not valid

trust me, i tried. reading from other "reputable
institutions....and it was either, one, not true compared to what
already learned, behind the times, out-dated, wrong, or also, i mean
reading, i could destroy it in the first sentence/paragraph. i coul
have written to the author, and destroyed it, same as our adam smith

my brother said that was semantics, so perhaps those authors (ther

has been more than one of this) could have re-written thei
intentions, in a better way that was valid, I DON'T KNOW. but whateve
they were trying to prove, was not sound, same as that copy of ada
smith, but it wasn't just a semantic argument TO ME

I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND HOW IT MADE SENSE IN SOME OTHER WAY, I WOUL

NEED FOR IT TO BE PRESENTED LOGICALLY, WITHOUT FUNDAMENTAL SEMANTI
FLAWS, RENDERING IT COMPLETELY MEANINGLESS FOR ME. I WASN'T PLAYING
JOKE, IF THERE WAS SOME WAY TO UNDERSTAND IT, OR READ BETWEEN TH
LINES, IT WAS BEYOND ME

Why 3:30 am, Rachel


This is a response to the post seen at
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658995311#65899531

[cheesetray]

Post by George Dance
The poem at 3 a.m
Does not want to be written;
It visits only to mock you
-GJ

it would make more sense to me if it were 3:30 am, bu
who am i to know anything? (seriously

man, i wish i could have kept going in school. :-((

it was getting so hard, but anything inferior, is just not valid
trust me, i tried. reading from other "reputable
institutions....and it was either, one, not true compared to what
already learned, behind the times, out-dated, wrong, or also, i mean
reading, i could destroy it in the first sentence/paragraph. i coul
have written to the author, and destroyed it, same as our adam smith

my brother said that was semantics, so perhaps those authors (ther
has been more than one of this) could have re-written thei
intentions, in a better way that was valid, I DON'T KNOW. but whateve
they were trying to prove, was not sound, same as that copy of ada
smith, but it wasn't just a semantic argument TO ME

I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND HOW IT MADE SENSE IN SOME OTHER WAY, I WOULD NEE
FOR IT TO BE PRESENTED LOGICALLY, WITHOUT FUNDAMENTAL SEMANTIC FLAWS
RENDERING IT COMPLETELY MEANINGLESS FOR ME. I WASN'T PLAYING A JOKE
IF THERE WAS SOME WAY TO UNDERSTAND IT, OR READ BETWEEN THE LINES, I
WAS BEYOND ME


This is a response to the post seen at
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658995311#65899531

[W.Dockery]

Post by George Dance
The poem at 3 a.m.
Does not want to be written;
It visits only to mock you.
-GJD

it would make more sense to me if it were 3:30 am, but
who am i to know anything? (seriously)
man, i wish i could have kept going in school. :-(((
it was getting so hard, but anything inferior, is just not valid.
trust me, i tried. reading from other "reputable"
institutions....and it was either, one, not true compared to what i
already learned, behind the times, out-dated, wrong, or also, i mean,
reading, i could destroy it in the first sentence/paragraph. i could
have written to the author, and destroyed it, same as our adam smith.
my brother said that was semantics, so perhaps those authors (there
has been more than one of this) could have re-written their
intentions, in a better way that was valid, I DON'T KNOW. but whatever
they were trying to prove, was not sound, same as that copy of adam
smith, but it wasn't just a semantic argument TO ME.
I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND HOW IT MADE SENSE IN SOME OTHER WAY, I WOULD NEED
FOR IT TO BE PRESENTED LOGICALLY, WITHOUT FUNDAMENTAL SEMANTIC FLAWS,
RENDERING IT COMPLETELY MEANINGLESS FOR ME. I WASN'T PLAYING A JOKE,
IF THERE WAS SOME WAY TO UNDERSTAND IT, OR READ BETWEEN THE LINES, IT
WAS BEYOND ME.
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658995311#658995311

For Leonard Cohen it was four in the morning, either way it's very late
or ready early.

[cheesetray]

Post by George Dance
The poem at 3 a.m
Does not want to be written;
It visits only to mock you
-GJ

that's when i died for love, obviously, mr. docker


This is a response to the post seen at
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658995311#65899531

[W.Dockery]

Post by George Dance
The poem at 3 a.m.
Does not want to be written;
It visits only to mock you.
-GJD

that's when i died for love, obviously, mr. dockery
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=658995311#658995311

In the Shakespearean sense, probably?