Discussion:
Lord, George was born a Nambla man ...
(too old to reply)
m***@gmail.com
2017-12-12 21:39:23 UTC
Permalink
George Dance: " And most members of NAMBLA aren't pedophiles.

MMP: You *are* a member of NAMBLA, aren't you?
George J. Dance
2017-12-12 21:48:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@gmail.com
George Dance: " And most members of NAMBLA aren't pedophiles.
MMP: You *are* a member of NAMBLA, aren't you?
No.

But you've said it twice. How many times do you think you need to say it before it becomes true?

Does just saying it work, or do you have to click your heels, too?
m***@gmail.com
2017-12-12 21:57:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by George J. Dance
Post by m***@gmail.com
George Dance: " And most members of NAMBLA aren't pedophiles.
MMP: You *are* a member of NAMBLA, aren't you?
No.
But you've said it twice. How many times do you think you need to say it before it becomes true?
Does just saying it work, or do you have to click your heels, too?
It's worth a try.

Just saying it isn't going to work because you've shown yourself to be a pathological liar.
George J. Dance
2017-12-12 22:04:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by George J. Dance
Post by m***@gmail.com
George Dance: " And most members of NAMBLA aren't pedophiles.
MMP: You *are* a member of NAMBLA, aren't you?
No.
But you've said it twice. How many times do you think you need to say it before it becomes true?
Does just saying it work, or do you have to click your heels, too?
It's worth a try.
When that's all you have.
Post by m***@gmail.com
Just saying it isn't going to work because you've shown yourself to be a pathological liar.
And it's not going to work to convince anyone else, unless you can "show" something that isn't your own writing.

But thanks for trying your one trick again. Now repeat and click:

"You've shown yourself to be a pathological liar" <click>
m***@gmail.com
2017-12-12 22:17:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by George J. Dance
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by George J. Dance
Post by m***@gmail.com
George Dance: " And most members of NAMBLA aren't pedophiles.
MMP: You *are* a member of NAMBLA, aren't you?
No.
But you've said it twice. How many times do you think you need to say it before it becomes true?
Does just saying it work, or do you have to click your heels, too?
It's worth a try.
When that's all you have.
That was sarcasm, Dunce. You haven't even got that.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by m***@gmail.com
Just saying it isn't going to work because you've shown yourself to be a pathological liar.
And it's not going to work to convince anyone else, unless you can "show" something that isn't your own writing.
I just asked a question.

You claimed that not all members of the North American Man-Boy Love Association were homosexuals or pedophiles. I find that extremely difficult to believe based upon the organization's name and their stated objective of legalizing adult sex with children.

I can't imagine why *anyone* who wasn't both a homosexual and a pedophile would want to be associated with such a disgusting group ... except for one whacked out Canuck politico who praises them as a champion of sexual equality.

So, I put it to you a third time: Are you a member?
s***@gmail.com
2017-12-12 23:06:16 UTC
Permalink
On Tuesday, December 12, 2017 at 2:18:00 PM UTC-8, ***@gmail.com wrote:

Shalom & Erev tov, George...I don't take anything this demented fascist states. Not all members of NAMBLA are gay, and since Paedodragon IS an ill-disguised lover of the bodies of young boys, then one has to question if his brain is literally malfunctioning. I am not a member of NAMBLA, and still believe in the constitutional right of them being free of censorship in what they say. Moreover, since Paedodragon cannot scientifically define his terms, because he is an antisemite, George it is futile to attempt dialogue with this parasite.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
STEPHAN PICKERING / חפץ ח"ם בן אברהם
Torah אלילה Yehu'di Apikores / Philologia Kabbalistica Speculativa Researcher
לחיות זמן רב ולשגשג...לעולם לא עוד
THE KABBALAH FRACTALS PROJECT

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
STEPHAN PICKERING / חפץ ח"ם בן אברהם
Torah אלילה Yehu'di Apikores / Philologia Kabbalistica Speculativa Researcher
לחיות זמן רב ולשגשג...לעולם לא עוד
THE KABBALAH FRACTALS PROJECT
m***@gmail.com
2017-12-13 03:30:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by s***@gmail.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
STEPHAN PICKERING / a member of NAMBLA
[edited for truth]
s***@gmail.com
2017-12-13 04:35:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by s***@gmail.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
STEPHAN PICKERING / a member of NAMBLA
[edited for truth]
Clumsy lies from you are predictable. I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of NAMBLA.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
STEPHAN PICKERING / חפץ ח"ם בן אברהם
Torah אלילה Yehu'di Apikores / Philologia Kabbalistica Speculativa Researcher
לחיות זמן רב ולשגשג...לעולם לא עוד
THE KABBALAH FRACTALS PROJECT
m***@gmail.com
2017-12-13 04:41:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by s***@gmail.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
STEPHAN PICKERING / a member of NAMBLA
[edited for truth]
I am a member of NAMBLA.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[edited for truth]
s***@gmail.com
2017-12-13 04:59:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by s***@gmail.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
STEPHAN PICKERING / a member of NAMBLA
[edited for truth]
I am a member of NAMBLA.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[edited for truth]
You remain a liar. Ask them, goy boy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
STEPHAN PICKERING / חפץ ח"ם בן אברהם
Torah אלילה Yehu'di Apikores / Philologia Kabbalistica Speculativa Researcher
לחיות זמן רב ולשגשג...לעולם לא עוד
THE KABBALAH FRACTALS PROJECT
m***@gmail.com
2017-12-13 05:09:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by s***@gmail.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
STEPHAN PICKERING / a member of NAMBLA
[edited for truth]
I am a member of NAMBLA.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[edited for truth]
STEPHAN PICKERING a liar. (G)oy boy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jung n znebba! - Ohtf Ohaal

Guvf pbhyq tb ba nyy avtug.
s***@gmail.com
2017-12-13 05:34:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@gmail.com
STEPHAN PICKERING a liar. (G)oy boy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jung n znebba! - Ohtf Ohaal
Guvf pbhyq tb ba nyy avtug.
Your last two entries are rather unoriginal, the first is your antisemitism.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
STEPHAN PICKERING / חפץ ח"ם בן אברהם
Torah אלילה Yehu'di Apikores / Philologia Kabbalistica Speculativa Researcher
לחיות זמן רב ולשגשג...לעולם לא עוד
THE KABBALAH FRACTALS PROJECT
George J. Dance
2017-12-13 08:15:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by George J. Dance
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by George J. Dance
Post by m***@gmail.com
George Dance: " And most members of NAMBLA aren't pedophiles.
MMP: You *are* a member of NAMBLA, aren't you?
No.
But you've said it twice. How many times do you think you need to say it before it becomes true?
Does just saying it work, or do you have to click your heels, too?
It's worth a try.
When that's all you have.
That was sarcasm, Dunce.
It was more a Freudian slip on your part, Pedodragon. The "Big Lie" technique is all you've got, and you're aware of it.
Post by m***@gmail.com
You haven't even got that.
I've got your number, at least; that's good enough.
Post by m***@gmail.com
Post by George J. Dance
Post by m***@gmail.com
Just saying it isn't going to work because you've shown yourself to be a pathological liar.
And it's not going to work to convince anyone else, unless you can "show" something that isn't your own writing.
I just asked a question.
You claimed that
<quote>
Post by m***@gmail.com
Most homosexuals are not pedophiles.
And most pedophiles are not homosexuals. And most members of NAMBLA aren't pedophiles. And most pedophiles aren't members of NAMBLA.
</q>
Post by m***@gmail.com
I find that extremely difficult to believe based upon the organization's name and their stated objective of legalizing adult sex with children.
I don't think you find it 'difficult' to believe at all. You just think that if you can convince others that pedophilia is somehow caused by NAMBLA, you can fool someone into thinking that you're against pedophilia and even want to do something about it.
Post by m***@gmail.com
I can't imagine why *anyone* who wasn't both a homosexual and a pedophile would want to be associated with such a disgusting group ...
Just ranting that everyone who opposes the higher "gay age of consent" you want is a secret member or "associate" of NAMBLA is not an argument for that law,you know. (Well, it actually is; jut not a very good one.

except for one whacked out Canuck politico who

- gives them credit for working to eliminate the "2 ages of consent" law that Pedodragon's been defending.
Post by m***@gmail.com
So, I put it to you a third time: Are you a member?
And, for the third time, you'll get the same answer: No.

Now, let's see how many more posts it takes before Pedodragon believes his newest "Big Lie."
m***@gmail.com
2017-12-13 14:12:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@gmail.com
And most members of NAMBLA aren't pedophiles.
'Nuff said.
Robert Burrows
2017-12-13 15:30:26 UTC
Permalink
Lord, George was born a nambla man
Justifyin’ evil and spinnin’ the best he can
And when it time for lyin’
He hopes you'll understand
That George was born a nambla man...
NancyGene
2019-01-28 18:03:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert Burrows
Lord, George was born a nambla man
Justifyin’ evil and spinnin’ the best he can
And when it time for lyin’
He hopes you'll understand
That George was born a nambla man...
This is a fine poem that should be expanded upon. It is as true now as it was a year ago.
George J. Dance
2019-01-28 18:28:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by NancyGene
Post by Robert Burrows
Lord, George was born a nambla man
Justifyin’ evil and spinnin’ the best he can
And when it time for lyin’
He hopes you'll understand
That George was born a nambla man...
This is a fine poem that should be expanded upon. It is as true now as it was a year ago.
Not true at all. IOW. But one wouldn't expect NAMBLAGene to worry about something like that, would one?
ME
2019-01-28 19:40:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by George J. Dance
Post by NancyGene
Post by Robert Burrows
Lord, George was born a nambla man
Justifyin’ evil and spinnin’ the best he can
And when it time for lyin’
He hopes you'll understand
That George was born a nambla man...
This is a fine poem that should be expanded upon. It is as true now as it was a year ago.
Not true at all. IOW. But one wouldn't expect NAMBLAGene to worry about something like that, would one?
Well george. If nothing else, maybe this lesson in “be careful of the things that you’re expected to defend and/or deflect against for pissbums and pickles”, has enlightened you.
George J. Dance
2019-01-28 20:56:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by ME
Post by George J. Dance
Post by NancyGene
Post by Robert Burrows
Lord, George was born a nambla man
Justifyin’ evil and spinnin’ the best he can
And when it time for lyin’
He hopes you'll understand
That George was born a nambla man...
This is a fine poem that should be expanded upon. It is as true now as it was a year ago.
Not true at all. IOW. But one wouldn't expect NAMBLAGene to worry about something like that, would one?
Well george. If nothing else, maybe this lesson in “be careful of the things that you’re expected to defend and/or deflect against for pissbums and pickles”, has enlightened you.
All it could have 'enlightened' me to is that y'all are willing to say anything to smear someone you feel like smearing. And that's not exactly news.
George J. Dance
2019-02-01 16:39:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robert Burrows
Lord, George was born a nambla man
Justifyin’ evil and spinnin’ the best he can
And when it time for lyin’
He hopes you'll understand
That George was born a nambla man...
NAMBLA forever, baby
George J. Dance
2019-02-01 16:57:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Robert Burrows
Lord, George was born a nambla man
Justifyin’ evil and spinnin’ the best he can
And when it time for lyin’
He hopes you'll understand
That George was born a nambla man...
NAMBLA forever, baby
<quote>
Post by George J. Dance
I saw it when you pretended to be George Dance... did it once... may do it again...
I might, rabbit... I might...
</q> Message-ID: <1330d49a-d2bb-4809-b35c-***@googlegroups.com>

You know, if you fakes are going to stick around, I'm going to have to call you something. I already have the name "Jim" for fake "Will Dockery." I think the best thing to call you is "Michael."
Coco DeSockmonkey
2019-02-01 17:03:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by George J. Dance
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Robert Burrows
Lord, George was born a nambla man
Justifyin’ evil and spinnin’ the best he can
And when it time for lyin’
He hopes you'll understand
That George was born a nambla man...
NAMBLA forever, baby
<quote>
Post by George J. Dance
I saw it when you pretended to be George Dance... did it once... may do it again...
I might, rabbit... I might...
You know, if you fakes are going to stick around, I'm going to have to call you something. I already have the name "Jim" for fake "Will Dockery." I think the best thing to call you is "Michael."
Trolling as usual, I see.
George J. Dance
2019-02-01 17:26:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Robert Burrows
Lord, George was born a nambla man
Justifyin’ evil and spinnin’ the best he can
And when it time for lyin’
He hopes you'll understand
That George was born a nambla man...
NAMBLA forever, baby
<quote>
Post by George J. Dance
I saw it when you pretended to be George Dance... did it once... may do it again...
I might, rabbit... I might...
You know, if you fakes are going to stick around, I'm going to have to call you something. I already have the name "Jim" for fake "Will Dockery." I think the best thing to call you is "Michael."
Trolling as usual, I see.
Someone is in this thread:

Michael: STEPHAN PICKERING / a member of NAMBLA
Stephan: I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of NAMBLA.
Michael: STEPHAN PICKERING a liar.

Michael: You *are* a member of NAMBLA, aren't you?
GJD: No.
Michael: Just saying it isn't going to work because you've shown yourself to be a pathological liar.
Michael: So, I put it to you a third time: Are you a member?

Not only have been trolling, but using the exact same trollschtick on everyone who's disagreed with the thread.

Now whine that you're NOT a troll because you called me a troll first.
Michael Pendragon
2019-02-01 18:18:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Robert Burrows
Lord, George was born a nambla man
Justifyin’ evil and spinnin’ the best he can
And when it time for lyin’
He hopes you'll understand
That George was born a nambla man...
NAMBLA forever, baby
<quote>
Post by George J. Dance
I saw it when you pretended to be George Dance... did it once... may do it again...
I might, rabbit... I might...
You know, if you fakes are going to stick around, I'm going to have to call you something. I already have the name "Jim" for fake "Will Dockery." I think the best thing to call you is "Michael."
Trolling as usual, I see.
Michael: STEPHAN PICKERING / a member of NAMBLA
Stephan: I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of NAMBLA.
Michael: STEPHAN PICKERING a liar.
Pick claimed to have been at some unspecified convention (or conventions) wherein NAMBLA members delivered speeches.

Now, admittedly I'm no expert on NAMBLA, but I doubt they'd be making speeches at local PTA.

IMO, Pick is a member.
Post by George J. Dance
Michael: You *are* a member of NAMBLA, aren't you?
GJD: No.
Michael: Just saying it isn't going to work because you've shown yourself to be a pathological liar.
Michael: So, I put it to you a third time: Are you a member?
You have championed NAMBLA as being at the forefront of the battle for sexual equality... twice. And you have recently accused me of "demonizing" NAMBLA -- as if anyone could possibly demonize an organization established to make sex between adult men and young boys legal.

So, yes, I strongly suspect that you've got some NAMBLA ties as well.
Post by George J. Dance
Not only have been trolling, but using the exact same trollschtick on everyone who's disagreed with the thread.
You forgot to post the dates of those exchanges, Dunce. I'm guessing they go back over a year.

Reopening old threads in order to rekindle a dead flame war is... trolling.
Post by George J. Dance
Now whine that you're NOT a troll because you called me a troll first.
I've trolled on several occasions in the past. We all have. However, you were the first to stir things up between us today.
George J. Dance
2019-02-04 16:45:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Robert Burrows
Lord, George was born a nambla man
Justifyin’ evil and spinnin’ the best he can
And when it time for lyin’
He hopes you'll understand
That George was born a nambla man...
NAMBLA forever, baby
<quote>
Post by George J. Dance
I saw it when you pretended to be George Dance... did it once... may do it again...
I might, rabbit... I might...
You know, if you fakes are going to stick around, I'm going to have to call you something. I already have the name "Jim" for fake "Will Dockery." I think the best thing to call you is "Michael."
Trolling as usual, I see.
Michael: STEPHAN PICKERING / a member of NAMBLA
Stephan: I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of NAMBLA.
Michael: STEPHAN PICKERING a liar.
Pick claimed to have been at some unspecified convention (or conventions) wherein NAMBLA members delivered speeches.
Now, admittedly I'm no expert on NAMBLA, but I doubt they'd be making speeches at local PTA.
IMO, Pick is a member.
Post by George J. Dance
Michael: You *are* a member of NAMBLA, aren't you?
GJD: No.
Michael: Just saying it isn't going to work because you've shown yourself to be a pathological liar.
Michael: So, I put it to you a third time: Are you a member?
You have championed NAMBLA as being at the forefront of the battle for sexual equality... twice. And you have recently accused me of "demonizing" NAMBLA -- as if anyone could possibly demonize an organization established to make sex between adult men and young boys legal.
Whatever, doggie. You asked, you got an answer. If you don't believe my answer, what's the point in asking me again? Only to troll.
Post by Michael Pendragon
So, yes, I strongly suspect that you've got some NAMBLA ties as well.
While I strongly suspect that you have alt.right ties, given the present political contex. But let me ask you, since I haven't:
What alt.right organizations are you a member or supporter of?
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Not only have been trolling, but using the exact same trollschtick on everyone who's disagreed with the thread.
You forgot to post the dates of those exchanges, Dunce. I'm guessing they go back over a year.
<shrug> They were in this thread, Pedodragon. Why should I waste my time looking for different ones.
Post by Michael Pendragon
Reopening old threads in order to rekindle a dead flame war is... trolling.
Then take it up with fake "George Dance", as I was responding to their post from Feb. 1, 2019.
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Now whine that you're NOT a troll because you called me a troll first.
I've trolled on several occasions in the past.
Indeed; you've even impersonated me, as I've shown - and told us that you "might" be doing it again, as recently as Jan. 29.
Post by Michael Pendragon
We all have. However, you were the first to stir things up between us today.
Actually, I stirred things up with fake "George J. Dance." But that's not to contradict you.
Michael Pendragon
2019-02-04 17:31:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Robert Burrows
Lord, George was born a nambla man
Justifyin’ evil and spinnin’ the best he can
And when it time for lyin’
He hopes you'll understand
That George was born a nambla man...
NAMBLA forever, baby
<quote>
Post by George J. Dance
I saw it when you pretended to be George Dance... did it once... may do it again...
I might, rabbit... I might...
You know, if you fakes are going to stick around, I'm going to have to call you something. I already have the name "Jim" for fake "Will Dockery." I think the best thing to call you is "Michael."
Trolling as usual, I see.
Michael: STEPHAN PICKERING / a member of NAMBLA
Stephan: I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of NAMBLA.
Michael: STEPHAN PICKERING a liar.
Pick claimed to have been at some unspecified convention (or conventions) wherein NAMBLA members delivered speeches.
Now, admittedly I'm no expert on NAMBLA, but I doubt they'd be making speeches at local PTA.
IMO, Pick is a member.
Post by George J. Dance
Michael: You *are* a member of NAMBLA, aren't you?
GJD: No.
Michael: Just saying it isn't going to work because you've shown yourself to be a pathological liar.
Michael: So, I put it to you a third time: Are you a member?
You have championed NAMBLA as being at the forefront of the battle for sexual equality... twice. And you have recently accused me of "demonizing" NAMBLA -- as if anyone could possibly demonize an organization established to make sex between adult men and young boys legal.
Whatever, doggie. You asked, you got an answer. If you don't believe my answer, what's the point in asking me again? Only to troll.
Your claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality leads me to suspect that you have some political ties to them.

Further, your claims that one can be a member without being a homosexual or a pedophile, makes me suspect that you *might* have a membership (again, for political purposes) as well.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
So, yes, I strongly suspect that you've got some NAMBLA ties as well.
What alt.right organizations are you a member or supporter of?
None.

I am not a member of, nor do I support, *any* organization.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Not only have been trolling, but using the exact same trollschtick on everyone who's disagreed with the thread.
You forgot to post the dates of those exchanges, Dunce. I'm guessing they go back over a year.
<shrug> They were in this thread, Pedodragon. Why should I waste my time looking for different ones.
No one asked you to post dates of "different ones," Dunce.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Reopening old threads in order to rekindle a dead flame war is... trolling.
Then take it up with fake "George Dance", as I was responding to their post from Feb. 1, 2019.
And you did so, by leveling accusations against me. I asked you to provide the dates of those incidences. Tellingly, you're playing stupid.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Now whine that you're NOT a troll because you called me a troll first.
I've trolled on several occasions in the past.
Indeed; you've even impersonated me, as I've shown - and told us that you "might" be doing it again, as recently as Jan. 29.
No. I said that I might be doing it in the future.

Why do you lie so much, Dunce?
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
We all have. However, you were the first to stir things up between us today.
Actually, I stirred things up with fake "George J. Dance." But that's not to contradict you.
Why do you insist on stirring things up with anyone?
George J. Dance
2019-02-04 18:27:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by George J. Dance
NAMBLA forever, baby
<quote>
Post by George J. Dance
I saw it when you pretended to be George Dance... did it once... may do it again...
I might, rabbit... I might...
You know, if you fakes are going to stick around, I'm going to have to call you something. I already have the name "Jim" for fake "Will Dockery." I think the best thing to call you is "Michael."
Trolling as usual, I see.
Michael: STEPHAN PICKERING / a member of NAMBLA
Stephan: I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of NAMBLA.
Michael: STEPHAN PICKERING a liar.
Pick claimed to have been at some unspecified convention (or conventions) wherein NAMBLA members delivered speeches.
Now, admittedly I'm no expert on NAMBLA, but I doubt they'd be making speeches at local PTA.
IMO, Pick is a member.
Post by George J. Dance
Michael: You *are* a member of NAMBLA, aren't you?
GJD: No.
Michael: Just saying it isn't going to work because you've shown yourself to be a pathological liar.
Michael: So, I put it to you a third time: Are you a member?
You have championed NAMBLA as being at the forefront of the battle for sexual equality... twice. And you have recently accused me of "demonizing" NAMBLA -- as if anyone could possibly demonize an organization established to make sex between adult men and young boys legal.
Whatever, doggie. You asked, you got an answer. If you don't believe my answer, what's the point in asking me again? Only to troll.
Your claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality leads me to suspect that you have some political ties to them.
Another Pedodragon lie: I simply gave them credit for helping to get rid of a couple of discriminatory laws. I've never said they "are" anything, let alone what you just called them. As best I can tell, all they are is defunct, for a quarter of a century.
Post by Michael Pendragon
Further, your claims that one can be a member without being a homosexual or a pedophile, makes me suspect that you *might* have a membership (again, for political purposes) as well.
I told you I'm not interested in that. As far as I know, there aren't any current members of NAMBLA; take it or leave it.
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
So, yes, I strongly suspect that you've got some NAMBLA ties as well.
What alt.right organizations are you a member or supporter of?
None.
I am not a member of, nor do I support, *any* organization.
Well, QAnon's not really an organization; just a network of people who post about alleged pedophiles on social media. Are you involved with them in any way?
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Not only have been trolling, but using the exact same trollschtick on everyone who's disagreed with the thread.
You forgot to post the dates of those exchanges, Dunce. I'm guessing they go back over a year.
<shrug> They were in this thread, Pedodragon. Why should I waste my time looking for different ones.
No one asked you to post dates of "different ones," Dunce.
Fine, Pedo: you want me to give you the dates from this thread. Your trolling, and your identical trolling of the other person, happened on December 12, 2017.
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Reopening old threads in order to rekindle a dead flame war is... trolling.
Then take it up with fake "George Dance", as I was responding to their post from Feb. 1, 2019.
And you did so, by leveling accusations against me.
No, I didn't.
Post by Michael Pendragon
I asked you to provide the dates of those incidences.
No, this is what you "asked" for:
<quote>
[GD:] > > > > Not only have been trolling, but using the exact same trollschtick on everyone who's disagreed with the thread.
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
You forgot to post the dates of those exchanges, Dunce. I'm guessing they go back over a year.
</q>
Post by Michael Pendragon
Tellingly, you're playing stupid.
You got what you "asked" for. You're welcome.
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Now whine that you're NOT a troll because you called me a troll first.
I've trolled on several occasions in the past.
Indeed; you've even impersonated me, as I've shown - and told us that you "might" be doing it again, as recently as Jan. 29.
No. I said that I might be doing it in the future.
Wrong again: you said you might do it "again."
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
<quote>
Post by George J. Dance
I saw it when you pretended to be George Dance... did it once... may do it again...
I might, rabbit... I might...
Why do you lie so much, Dunce?
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
We all have. However, you were the first to stir things up between us today.
Actually, I stirred things up with fake "George J. Dance." But that's not to contradict you.
Why do you insist on stirring things up with anyone?
For the same reason that I'd try to "stir things up" with someone who took a swing at me. Why do you insist on defending people like that?
Michael Pendragon
2019-02-04 18:51:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by George J. Dance
NAMBLA forever, baby
<quote>
Post by George J. Dance
I saw it when you pretended to be George Dance... did it once... may do it again...
I might, rabbit... I might...
You know, if you fakes are going to stick around, I'm going to have to call you something. I already have the name "Jim" for fake "Will Dockery." I think the best thing to call you is "Michael."
Trolling as usual, I see.
Michael: STEPHAN PICKERING / a member of NAMBLA
Stephan: I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of NAMBLA.
Michael: STEPHAN PICKERING a liar.
Pick claimed to have been at some unspecified convention (or conventions) wherein NAMBLA members delivered speeches.
Now, admittedly I'm no expert on NAMBLA, but I doubt they'd be making speeches at local PTA.
IMO, Pick is a member.
Post by George J. Dance
Michael: You *are* a member of NAMBLA, aren't you?
GJD: No.
Michael: Just saying it isn't going to work because you've shown yourself to be a pathological liar.
Michael: So, I put it to you a third time: Are you a member?
You have championed NAMBLA as being at the forefront of the battle for sexual equality... twice. And you have recently accused me of "demonizing" NAMBLA -- as if anyone could possibly demonize an organization established to make sex between adult men and young boys legal.
Whatever, doggie. You asked, you got an answer. If you don't believe my answer, what's the point in asking me again? Only to troll.
Your claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality leads me to suspect that you have some political ties to them.
Another Pedodragon lie: I simply gave them credit for helping to get rid of a couple of discriminatory laws. I've never said they "are" anything, let alone what you just called them. As best I can tell, all they are is defunct, for a quarter of a century.
Here is your statement, Dunce:

DUNCE: "Another Pedodragon lie. You've ranted and raved for a month about the group that's done the most to fight the above discrimination."

Why do you lie so much?
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Further, your claims that one can be a member without being a homosexual or a pedophile, makes me suspect that you *might* have a membership (again, for political purposes) as well.
I told you I'm not interested in that. As far as I know, there aren't any current members of NAMBLA; take it or leave it.
Wikipedia reports that their membership has "dwindled." However, the organization still remains in operation.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
So, yes, I strongly suspect that you've got some NAMBLA ties as well.
What alt.right organizations are you a member or supporter of?
None.
I am not a member of, nor do I support, *any* organization.
Well, QAnon's not really an organization; just a network of people who post about alleged pedophiles on social media. Are you involved with them in any way?
Never heard of them.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Not only have been trolling, but using the exact same trollschtick on everyone who's disagreed with the thread.
You forgot to post the dates of those exchanges, Dunce. I'm guessing they go back over a year.
<shrug> They were in this thread, Pedodragon. Why should I waste my time looking for different ones.
No one asked you to post dates of "different ones," Dunce.
Fine, Pedo: you want me to give you the dates from this thread. Your trolling, and your identical trolling of the other person, happened on December 12, 2017.
Like I said: over a year ago.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Reopening old threads in order to rekindle a dead flame war is... trolling.
Then take it up with fake "George Dance", as I was responding to their post from Feb. 1, 2019.
And you did so, by leveling accusations against me.
No, I didn't.
Post by Michael Pendragon
I asked you to provide the dates of those incidences.
<quote>
[GD:] > > > > Not only have been trolling, but using the exact same trollschtick on everyone who's disagreed with the thread.
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
You forgot to post the dates of those exchanges, Dunce. I'm guessing they go back over a year.
</q>
Post by Michael Pendragon
Tellingly, you're playing stupid.
You got what you "asked" for. You're welcome.
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Now whine that you're NOT a troll because you called me a troll first.
I've trolled on several occasions in the past.
Indeed; you've even impersonated me, as I've shown - and told us that you "might" be doing it again, as recently as Jan. 29.
No. I said that I might be doing it in the future.
Wrong again: you said you might do it "again."
"Might do it again" means that I have done it the past and might do so in the future, Dunce. It does not mean, nor even imply, that I am doing so at present.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
<quote>
Post by George J. Dance
I saw it when you pretended to be George Dance... did it once... may do it again...
I might, rabbit... I might...
Why do you lie so much, Dunce?
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
We all have. However, you were the first to stir things up between us today.
Actually, I stirred things up with fake "George J. Dance." But that's not to contradict you.
Why do you insist on stirring things up with anyone?
For the same reason that I'd try to "stir things up" with someone who took a swing at me. Why do you insist on defending people like that?
Here is your trollpost from Feb 1, Dunce:

"You know, if you fakes are going to stick around, I'm going to have to call you something. I already have the name 'Jim' for fake 'Will Dockery.' I think the best thing to call you is 'Michael.'"

I'm defending myself.
George J. Dance
2019-02-06 15:25:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by George J. Dance
NAMBLA forever, baby
<quote>
Post by George J. Dance
I saw it when you pretended to be George Dance... did it once... may do it again...
I might, rabbit... I might...
You know, if you fakes are going to stick around, I'm going to have to call you something. I already have the name "Jim" for fake "Will Dockery." I think the best thing to call you is "Michael."
Trolling as usual, I see.
Michael: STEPHAN PICKERING / a member of NAMBLA
Stephan: I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of NAMBLA.
Michael: STEPHAN PICKERING a liar.
Pick claimed to have been at some unspecified convention (or conventions) wherein NAMBLA members delivered speeches.
Now, admittedly I'm no expert on NAMBLA, but I doubt they'd be making speeches at local PTA.
IMO, Pick is a member.
Post by George J. Dance
Michael: You *are* a member of NAMBLA, aren't you?
GJD: No.
Michael: Just saying it isn't going to work because you've shown yourself to be a pathological liar.
Michael: So, I put it to you a third time: Are you a member?
You have championed NAMBLA as being at the forefront of the battle for sexual equality... twice. And you have recently accused me of "demonizing" NAMBLA -- as if anyone could possibly demonize an organization established to make sex between adult men and young boys legal.
Whatever, doggie. You asked, you got an answer. If you don't believe my answer, what's the point in asking me again? Only to troll.
Your claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality leads me to suspect that you have some political ties to them.
Another Pedodragon lie: I simply gave them credit for helping to get rid of a couple of discriminatory laws. I've never said they "are" anything, let alone what you just called them. As best I can tell, all they are is defunct, for a quarter of a century.
DUNCE: "Another Pedodragon lie. You've ranted and raved for a month about the group that's done the most to fight the above discrimination."
Why do you lie so much?
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Further, your claims that one can be a member without being a homosexual or a pedophile, makes me suspect that you *might* have a membership (again, for political purposes) as well.
I told you I'm not interested in that. As far as I know, there aren't any current members of NAMBLA; take it or leave it.
Wikipedia reports that their membership has "dwindled." However, the organization still remains in operation.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
So, yes, I strongly suspect that you've got some NAMBLA ties as well.
What alt.right organizations are you a member or supporter of?
None.
I am not a member of, nor do I support, *any* organization.
Well, QAnon's not really an organization; just a network of people who post about alleged pedophiles on social media. Are you involved with them in any way?
Never heard of them.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Not only have been trolling, but using the exact same trollschtick on everyone who's disagreed with the thread.
You forgot to post the dates of those exchanges, Dunce. I'm guessing they go back over a year.
<shrug> They were in this thread, Pedodragon. Why should I waste my time looking for different ones.
No one asked you to post dates of "different ones," Dunce.
Fine, Pedo: you want me to give you the dates from this thread. Your trolling, and your identical trolling of the other person, happened on December 12, 2017.
Like I said: over a year ago.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Reopening old threads in order to rekindle a dead flame war is... trolling.
Then take it up with fake "George Dance", as I was responding to their post from Feb. 1, 2019.
And you did so, by leveling accusations against me.
No, I didn't.
Post by Michael Pendragon
I asked you to provide the dates of those incidences.
<quote>
[GD:] > > > > Not only have been trolling, but using the exact same trollschtick on everyone who's disagreed with the thread.
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
You forgot to post the dates of those exchanges, Dunce. I'm guessing they go back over a year.
</q>
Post by Michael Pendragon
Tellingly, you're playing stupid.
You got what you "asked" for. You're welcome.
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Now whine that you're NOT a troll because you called me a troll first.
I've trolled on several occasions in the past.
Indeed; you've even impersonated me, as I've shown - and told us that you "might" be doing it again, as recently as Jan. 29.
No. I said that I might be doing it in the future.
Wrong again: you said you might do it "again."
"Might do it again" means that I have done it the past and might do so
- "again", at any time.
Post by Michael Pendragon
in the future, Dunce. It does not mean, nor even imply, that I am doing so at present.
Nor did anyone say it did imply that, Mr. Strawman. It merely implies that you did it once, and "might" have done it since.
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
<quote>
Post by George J. Dance
I saw it when you pretended to be George Dance... did it once... may do it again...
I might, rabbit... I might...
Why do you lie so much, Dunce?
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
We all have. However, you were the first to stir things up between us today.
Actually, I stirred things up with fake "George J. Dance." But that's not to contradict you.
Why do you insist on stirring things up with anyone?
For the same reason that I'd try to "stir things up" with someone who took a swing at me. Why do you insist on defending people like that?
"You know, if you fakes are going to stick around, I'm going to have to call you something. I already have the name 'Jim' for fake 'Will Dockery.' I think the best thing to call you is 'Michael.'"
I'm defending myself.
Once again: you're defending fake "George J. Dance" from my "trolling" of the poor thing.
George J. Dance
2019-02-06 17:35:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Your claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality leads me to suspect that you have some political ties to them.
Another Pedodragon lie: I simply gave them credit for helping to get rid of a couple of discriminatory laws. I've never said they "are" anything, let alone what you just called them. As best I can tell, all they are is defunct, for a quarter of a century.
DUNCE: "Another Pedodragon lie. You've ranted and raved for a month about the group that's done the most to fight the above discrimination."
Which is not a "claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality." You lied again, as I pointed out.
Post by Michael Pendragon
Why do you lie so much?
Why do you IKYABWAI so much, Pedodragon?
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Further, your claims that one can be a member without being a homosexual or a pedophile, makes me suspect that you *might* have a membership (again, for political purposes) as well.
I told you I'm not interested in that. As far as I know, there aren't any current members of NAMBLA; take it or leave it.
Wikipedia reports that their membership has "dwindled."
Wikipedia "reported" that at least 7 years ago: "More recently, media reports have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts."
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association&oldid=381021812
The cite for that was a 2001 article.
Post by Michael Pendragon
However, the organization still remains in operation.
What's your cite for that? Or is your claim based on what Wikipedia calls "original research"?
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
So, yes, I strongly suspect that you've got some NAMBLA ties as well.
What alt.right organizations are you a member or supporter of?
None.
I am not a member of, nor do I support, *any* organization.
Well, QAnon's not really an organization; just a network of people who post about alleged pedophiles on social media. Are you involved with them in any way?
Never heard of them.
I see I'll have to post something here about them.
Coco DeSockmonkey
2019-02-06 18:30:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Your claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality leads me to suspect that you have some political ties to them.
Another Pedodragon lie: I simply gave them credit for helping to get rid of a couple of discriminatory laws. I've never said they "are" anything, let alone what you just called them. As best I can tell, all they are is defunct, for a quarter of a century.
DUNCE: "Another Pedodragon lie. You've ranted and raved for a month about the group that's done the most to fight the above discrimination."
Which is not a "claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality." You lied again, as I pointed out.
The "above discrimination" was pertaining to the LGBT community. How is your statement not saying this?
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Why do you lie so much?
Why do you IKYABWAI so much, Pedodragon?
But my statement precedes yours... oh, never mind. You're obviously just trolling again.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Further, your claims that one can be a member without being a homosexual or a pedophile, makes me suspect that you *might* have a membership (again, for political purposes) as well.
I told you I'm not interested in that. As far as I know, there aren't any current members of NAMBLA; take it or leave it.
Wikipedia reports that their membership has "dwindled."
Wikipedia "reported" that at least 7 years ago: "More recently, media reports have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts."
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association&oldid=381021812
The cite for that was a 2001 article.
Well, that's certainly good news.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
However, the organization still remains in operation.
What's your cite for that? Or is your claim based on what Wikipedia calls "original research"?
My statement was based solely on the Wikipedia article. I've never had any interest in NAMBLA and would not waste my time researching them.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
So, yes, I strongly suspect that you've got some NAMBLA ties as well.
What alt.right organizations are you a member or supporter of?
None.
I am not a member of, nor do I support, *any* organization.
Well, QAnon's not really an organization; just a network of people who post about alleged pedophiles on social media. Are you involved with them in any way?
Never heard of them.
I see I'll have to post something here about them.
Why bother? I'm obviously not a member.
Clay Dockery
2019-02-06 19:47:46 UTC
Permalink
Why is George Dance always at the ready to defend sexual deviancy? He was quick to dismiss the foreskin sucking mohels until articles were posted showing Jewish babies contracting STDs. It does make one wonder about his agenda. Apparently his libertarian agenda extends into his own disgustingly dark habits.
Coco DeSockmonkey
2019-02-06 19:53:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Clay Dockery
Why is George Dance always at the ready to defend sexual deviancy? He was quick to dismiss the foreskin sucking mohels until articles were posted showing Jewish babies contracting STDs. It does make one wonder about his agenda. Apparently his libertarian agenda extends into his own disgustingly dark habits.
I think we can all be eternally grateful that Dunce's political career never amounted to a hill of beans.
Zod
2019-02-07 15:17:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by Clay Dockery
Why is George Dance always at the ready to defend sexual deviancy? He was quick to dismiss the foreskin sucking mohels until articles were posted showing Jewish babies contracting STDs. It does make one wonder about his agenda. Apparently his libertarian agenda extends into his own disgustingly dark habits.
I think we can all be eternally grateful that Dunce's political career never amounted to a hill of beans.
Another failure in his cap.
George J. Dance
2019-02-07 16:42:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Your claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality leads me to suspect that you have some political ties to them.
Another Pedodragon lie: I simply gave them credit for helping to get rid of a couple of discriminatory laws. I've never said they "are" anything, let alone what you just called them. As best I can tell, all they are is defunct, for a quarter of a century.
DUNCE: "Another Pedodragon lie. You've ranted and raved for a month about the group that's done the most to fight the above discrimination."
Which is not a "claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality." You lied again, as I pointed out.
The "above discrimination" was pertaining to the LGBT community. How is your statement not saying this?
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Why do you lie so much?
Why do you IKYABWAI so much, Pedodragon?
But my statement precedes yours... oh, never mind. You're obviously just trolling again.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Further, your claims that one can be a member without being a homosexual or a pedophile, makes me suspect that you *might* have a membership (again, for political purposes) as well.
I told you I'm not interested in that. As far as I know, there aren't any current members of NAMBLA; take it or leave it.
Wikipedia reports that their membership has "dwindled."
Wikipedia "reported" that at least 7 years ago: "More recently, media reports have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts."
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association&oldid=381021812
The cite for that was a 2001 article.
Well, that's certainly good news.
It may be "great" but it's definitely not news. Must you lie about *everthing*, Pedodragon?
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
However, the organization still remains in operation.
What's your cite for that? Or is your claim based on what Wikipedia calls "original research"?
My statement was based solely on the Wikipedia article. I've never had any interest in NAMBLA and would not waste my time researching them.
So stop pretending that you have done any research.
Coco DeSockmonkey
2019-02-07 16:49:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Your claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality leads me to suspect that you have some political ties to them.
Another Pedodragon lie: I simply gave them credit for helping to get rid of a couple of discriminatory laws. I've never said they "are" anything, let alone what you just called them. As best I can tell, all they are is defunct, for a quarter of a century.
DUNCE: "Another Pedodragon lie. You've ranted and raved for a month about the group that's done the most to fight the above discrimination."
Which is not a "claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality." You lied again, as I pointed out.
The "above discrimination" was pertaining to the LGBT community. How is your statement not saying this?
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Why do you lie so much?
Why do you IKYABWAI so much, Pedodragon?
But my statement precedes yours... oh, never mind. You're obviously just trolling again.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Further, your claims that one can be a member without being a homosexual or a pedophile, makes me suspect that you *might* have a membership (again, for political purposes) as well.
I told you I'm not interested in that. As far as I know, there aren't any current members of NAMBLA; take it or leave it.
Wikipedia reports that their membership has "dwindled."
Wikipedia "reported" that at least 7 years ago: "More recently, media reports have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts."
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association&oldid=381021812
The cite for that was a 2001 article.
Well, that's certainly good news.
It may be "great" but it's definitely not news. Must you lie about *everthing*, Pedodragon?
It's news to me, Dunce.

Like I said, I don't share your admiration for, or interest in, them.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
However, the organization still remains in operation.
What's your cite for that? Or is your claim based on what Wikipedia calls "original research"?
My statement was based solely on the Wikipedia article. I've never had any interest in NAMBLA and would not waste my time researching them.
So stop pretending that you have done any research.
I haven't. Why do you lie so much, Dunce?
George J. Dance
2019-02-07 18:22:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Your claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality leads me to suspect that you have some political ties to them.
Another Pedodragon lie: I simply gave them credit for helping to get rid of a couple of discriminatory laws. I've never said they "are" anything, let alone what you just called them. As best I can tell, all they are is defunct, for a quarter of a century.
DUNCE: "Another Pedodragon lie. You've ranted and raved for a month about the group that's done the most to fight the above discrimination."
Which is not a "claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality." You lied again, as I pointed out.
The "above discrimination" was pertaining to the LGBT community. How is your statement not saying this?
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Why do you lie so much?
Why do you IKYABWAI so much, Pedodragon?
But my statement precedes yours... oh, never mind. You're obviously just trolling again.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Further, your claims that one can be a member without being a homosexual or a pedophile, makes me suspect that you *might* have a membership (again, for political purposes) as well.
I told you I'm not interested in that. As far as I know, there aren't any current members of NAMBLA; take it or leave it.
Wikipedia reports that their membership has "dwindled."
Wikipedia "reported" that at least 7 years ago: "More recently, media reports have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts."
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association&oldid=381021812
The cite for that was a 2001 article.
Well, that's certainly good news.
It may be "great" but it's definitely not news. Must you lie about *everthing*, Pedodragon?
It's news to me, Dunce.
Like I said, I don't share your admiration for, or interest in, them.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
However, the organization still remains in operation.
What's your cite for that? Or is your claim based on what Wikipedia calls "original research"?
My statement was based solely on the Wikipedia article. I've never had any interest in NAMBLA and would not waste my time researching them.
So stop pretending that you have done any research.
I haven't.
When go around telling others stories like "the organization still remains in operation," of course you're pretending that you know what you're talking about (rather than just pretending).
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Why do you lie so much, Dunce?
Why do you pretend so much, Pedodragon?
Coco DeSockmonkey
2019-02-07 18:40:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Your claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality leads me to suspect that you have some political ties to them.
Another Pedodragon lie: I simply gave them credit for helping to get rid of a couple of discriminatory laws. I've never said they "are" anything, let alone what you just called them. As best I can tell, all they are is defunct, for a quarter of a century.
DUNCE: "Another Pedodragon lie. You've ranted and raved for a month about the group that's done the most to fight the above discrimination."
Which is not a "claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality." You lied again, as I pointed out.
The "above discrimination" was pertaining to the LGBT community. How is your statement not saying this?
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Why do you lie so much?
Why do you IKYABWAI so much, Pedodragon?
But my statement precedes yours... oh, never mind. You're obviously just trolling again.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Further, your claims that one can be a member without being a homosexual or a pedophile, makes me suspect that you *might* have a membership (again, for political purposes) as well.
I told you I'm not interested in that. As far as I know, there aren't any current members of NAMBLA; take it or leave it.
Wikipedia reports that their membership has "dwindled."
Wikipedia "reported" that at least 7 years ago: "More recently, media reports have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts."
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association&oldid=381021812
The cite for that was a 2001 article.
Well, that's certainly good news.
It may be "great" but it's definitely not news. Must you lie about *everthing*, Pedodragon?
It's news to me, Dunce.
Like I said, I don't share your admiration for, or interest in, them.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
However, the organization still remains in operation.
What's your cite for that? Or is your claim based on what Wikipedia calls "original research"?
My statement was based solely on the Wikipedia article. I've never had any interest in NAMBLA and would not waste my time researching them.
So stop pretending that you have done any research.
I haven't.
When go around telling others stories like "the organization still remains in operation," of course you're pretending that you know what you're talking about (rather than just pretending).
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Why do you lie so much, Dunce?
Why do you pretend so much, Pedodragon?
AFAIK, it still does.

Granted Wikipedia isn't the most reliable source... but I'd trust it over George Dance any day.
George J. Dance
2019-02-11 11:25:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Your claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality leads me to suspect that you have some political ties to them.
Another Pedodragon lie: I simply gave them credit for helping to get rid of a couple of discriminatory laws. I've never said they "are" anything, let alone what you just called them. As best I can tell, all they are is defunct, for a quarter of a century.
DUNCE: "Another Pedodragon lie. You've ranted and raved for a month about the group that's done the most to fight the above discrimination."
Which is not a "claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality." You lied again, as I pointed out.
The "above discrimination" was pertaining to the LGBT community. How is your statement not saying this?
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Why do you lie so much?
Why do you IKYABWAI so much, Pedodragon?
But my statement precedes yours... oh, never mind. You're obviously just trolling again.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Further, your claims that one can be a member without being a homosexual or a pedophile, makes me suspect that you *might* have a membership (again, for political purposes) as well.
I told you I'm not interested in that. As far as I know, there aren't any current members of NAMBLA; take it or leave it.
Wikipedia reports that their membership has "dwindled."
Wikipedia "reported" that at least 7 years ago: "More recently, media reports have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts."
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association&oldid=381021812
The cite for that was a 2001 article.
Well, that's certainly good news.
It may be "great" but it's definitely not news. Must you lie about *everthing*, Pedodragon?
It's news to me, Dunce.
Like I said, I don't share your admiration for, or interest in, them.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
However, the organization still remains in operation.
What's your cite for that? Or is your claim based on what Wikipedia calls "original research"?
My statement was based solely on the Wikipedia article. I've never had any interest in NAMBLA and would not waste my time researching them.
So stop pretending that you have done any research.
I haven't.
When go around telling others stories like "the organization still remains in operation," of course you're pretending that you know what you're talking about (rather than just pretending).
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Why do you lie so much, Dunce?
Why do you pretend so much, Pedodragon?
AFAIK, it still does.
Granted Wikipedia isn't the most reliable source... but I'd trust it over George Dance any day.
Of course Wikipedia doesn't say that. Maybe you'd like to argue that, because parts of the article use the present tense, they're "implying" it - but that's as easily attributed to amateur editing.
Brother Dave Dockery
2019-02-11 18:38:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Your claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality leads me to suspect that you have some political ties to them.
Another Pedodragon lie: I simply gave them credit for helping to get rid of a couple of discriminatory laws. I've never said they "are" anything, let alone what you just called them. As best I can tell, all they are is defunct, for a quarter of a century.
DUNCE: "Another Pedodragon lie. You've ranted and raved for a month about the group that's done the most to fight the above discrimination."
Which is not a "claim that they are the leading organization in the fight for sexual equality." You lied again, as I pointed out.
The "above discrimination" was pertaining to the LGBT community. How is your statement not saying this?
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Why do you lie so much?
Why do you IKYABWAI so much, Pedodragon?
But my statement precedes yours... oh, never mind. You're obviously just trolling again.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
Further, your claims that one can be a member without being a homosexual or a pedophile, makes me suspect that you *might* have a membership (again, for political purposes) as well.
I told you I'm not interested in that. As far as I know, there aren't any current members of NAMBLA; take it or leave it.
Wikipedia reports that their membership has "dwindled."
Wikipedia "reported" that at least 7 years ago: "More recently, media reports have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts."
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association&oldid=381021812
The cite for that was a 2001 article.
Well, that's certainly good news.
It may be "great" but it's definitely not news. Must you lie about *everthing*, Pedodragon?
It's news to me, Dunce.
Like I said, I don't share your admiration for, or interest in, them.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
However, the organization still remains in operation.
What's your cite for that? Or is your claim based on what Wikipedia calls "original research"?
My statement was based solely on the Wikipedia article. I've never had any interest in NAMBLA and would not waste my time researching them.
So stop pretending that you have done any research.
I haven't.
When go around telling others stories like "the organization still remains in operation," of course you're pretending that you know what you're talking about (rather than just pretending).
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Why do you lie so much, Dunce?
Why do you pretend so much, Pedodragon?
AFAIK, it still does.
Granted Wikipedia isn't the most reliable source... but I'd trust it over George Dance any day.
You and the voters in Canada. He's built up quite a sleazy resume on here but I doubt he would be foolish enough to run again considering all the dug up dirt.
George J. Dance
2019-02-11 11:39:06 UTC
Permalink
On Thursday, February 7, 2019 at 11:42:55 AM UTC-5, George J. Dance > > > > > Wikipedia reports that their membership has "dwindled."
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Wikipedia "reported" that at least 7 years ago: "More recently, media reports have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts."
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association&oldid=381021812
The cite for that was a 2001 article.
Well, that's certainly good news.
It may be "great" but it's definitely not news. Must you lie about *everthing*, Pedodragon?
It's news to me, Dunce.
Yet you read the very same Wikipedia article, Pedodragon. In fact, it's the one you cited for your claim that "the organization still remains in operation."
Like I said, I don't share your admiration for, or interest in, them.
You certainly are more interested in them than I am. As I've pointed out, I wouldn't write about them at all if you didn't keep bringing them up.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
However, the organization still remains in operation.
What's your cite for that? Or is your claim based on what Wikipedia calls "original research"?
My statement was based solely on the Wikipedia article.
You mean, the article that says that "for practical purposes the group no longer exists" as of 2001. The one you admit you didn't read (as my pointing out that's what the article said was "news" to you). Let's just note that it does not say that "the organization still remains in operation" - that was your own claim, in own words, as usual.)
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
I've never had any interest in NAMBLA and would not waste my time researching them.
So stop pretending that you have done any research.
I haven't.
Bullshit again. When you go around trying to "correct" others' claims, of course you're pretending you know more about the subject than they do.
Why do you lie so much, Dunce?
Why do you project so much, Pedodragon?
Michael Pendragon
2019-02-11 15:09:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by George J. Dance
On Thursday, February 7, 2019 at 11:42:55 AM UTC-5, George J. Dance > > > > > Wikipedia reports that their membership has "dwindled."
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Wikipedia "reported" that at least 7 years ago: "More recently, media reports have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts."
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=North_American_Man/Boy_Love_Association&oldid=381021812
The cite for that was a 2001 article.
Well, that's certainly good news.
It may be "great" but it's definitely not news. Must you lie about *everthing*, Pedodragon?
It's news to me, Dunce.
Yet you read the very same Wikipedia article, Pedodragon. In fact, it's the one you cited for your claim that "the organization still remains in operation."
Like I said, I don't share your admiration for, or interest in, them.
You certainly are more interested in them than I am. As I've pointed out, I wouldn't write about them at all if you didn't keep bringing them up.
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Michael Pendragon
However, the organization still remains in operation.
What's your cite for that? Or is your claim based on what Wikipedia calls "original research"?
My statement was based solely on the Wikipedia article.
You mean, the article that says that "for practical purposes the group no longer exists" as of 2001. The one you admit you didn't read (as my pointing out that's what the article said was "news" to you). Let's just note that it does not say that "the organization still remains in operation" - that was your own claim, in own words, as usual.)
I mean the one that says: "Since then, the organization has dwindled to only a handful of people, with many members joining online pedophile networks such as DanPedo, BoyChat, and Annabelleigh, according to Xavier Von Erck, director of operations at the anti-pedophile organization Perverted-Justice."
Post by George J. Dance
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Coco DeSockmonkey
I've never had any interest in NAMBLA and would not waste my time researching them.
So stop pretending that you have done any research.
I haven't.
Bullshit again. When you go around trying to "correct" others' claims, of course you're pretending you know more about the subject than they do.
I've stated that my source was... Wikipedia. That's hardly an admission of any inside knowledge, Dunce.

Why do you lie so much?
Post by George J. Dance
Why do you lie so much, Dunce?
Why do you project so much, Pedodragon?
Will Dockery
2019-02-02 02:57:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by George J. Dance
Post by Robert Burrows
Lord, George was born a nambla man
Justifyin’ evil and spinnin’ the best he can
And when it time for lyin’
He hopes you'll understand
That George was born a nambla man...
NAMBLA forever, baby
I like em young myself.
Will Dockery™
2019-02-04 18:08:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Will Dockery
I like
To pretend to be "Will Dockery"?

Obviously you do, impostor troll.

;)
George J. Dance
2019-02-04 18:42:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Will Dockery
Post by George J. Dance
NAMBLA forever, baby
I like em young myself.
So did the other Jim, Jim. He had major problems with my proposal to raise the age of consent to 21.
Will Dockery™
2019-02-04 18:04:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by m***@gmail.com
NAMBLA
An anonymous impostor troll is a supporter of child molesters, no surprise.

:)
Loading...